| | | |

Core i3-10100T vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE


Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 4750GE is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the 4750GE gets 469.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 4750GE is 2.1 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
860f01
Core
Comet Lake-S
Renoir
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
April 2020
July 2020

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
4750GE
Test#1 (Integers)
24309
16952 (-30.26%)
Test#2 (FP)
22147
26258 (18.56%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5142
9397 (82.76%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8459
8384 (-0.88%)
TOTAL
60056
60991 (1.56%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

4750GE
Test#1 (Integers)
101485
159868 (57.53%)
Test#2 (FP)
98041
215441 (119.75%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24281
88453 (264.29%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3863
5905 (52.85%)
TOTAL
227670
469666 (106.29%)

Performance/W
i3-10100T
4750GE
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
4568 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
6155 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
2527 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
169 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
13419 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
4750GE
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
3942 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
6107 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
2185 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
1950 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
14184 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9