| | | | | | |

Core i3-10100T vs Ryzen 7 5800H


Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 5800H is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the 5800H gets 426.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 5800H is 1.9 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
a50f00
Core
Comet Lake-S
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2020
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
60.06k points
74.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
227.67k points
426.9k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10100T
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
4.32k
4.31k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
15.7k
17.51k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.04k
10.53k (x2.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.68k
23.57k (x3.07)
TOTAL
32.73k
55.92k (x1.71)

Multithread

i3-10100T

5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.59k
24.18k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
71.1k
117.98k (x1.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.26k
70.96k (x3.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
8.08k (x2.09)
TOTAL
114.81k
221.19k (x1.93)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
24.31k
20.37k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
22.15k
22.52k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.14k
10.18k (x1.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.46k
21.49k (x2.54)
TOTAL
60.06k
74.56k (x1.24)

Multithread

i3-10100T

5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
101.48k
144.01k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
98.04k
191.86k (x1.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.28k
84.53k (x3.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
6.5k (x1.68)
TOTAL
227.67k
426.9k (x1.88)

Performance/W
i3-10100T
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
3200 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
4264 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
1878 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
144 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
9487 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
4630 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
5117 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
2314 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
4883 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
16944 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4