Core i3-10100T vs Ryzen 7 3800X
Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3800X is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the 3800X gets 497.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800X is 2.2 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the 3800X gets 497.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800X is 2.2 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
870f10
Core
Comet Lake-S
Matisse
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
65 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
32768 kB
Date
April 2020
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
60.06k points
75.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
227.67k points
497.74k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10100T
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
4.32k
4.47k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
15.7k
17.41k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.04k
8.23k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.68k
25.15k (x3.28)
TOTAL
32.73k
55.26k (x1.69)
Multithread
i3-10100T
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
16.59k
36.1k (x2.18)
Test#2 (FP)
71.1k
178.65k (x2.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.26k
95.98k (x4.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
16.03k (x4.15)
TOTAL
114.81k
326.76k (x2.85)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10100T
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
13.84k
17.17k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
19.79k
25.32k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.28k
8.36k (x1.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.31k
27.86k (x3.35)
TOTAL
47.22k
78.71k (x1.67)
Multithread
i3-10100T
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
54.67k
136.06k (x2.49)
Test#2 (FP)
90.71k
195.06k (x2.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.11k
97.81k (x4.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
12.91k (x3.35)
TOTAL
173.34k
441.85k (x2.55)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10100T
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
13.88k
16.76k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
20.94k
25.16k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
8.76k (x1.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.2k
24.3k (x2.96)
TOTAL
48.19k
74.98k (x1.56)
Multithread
i3-10100T
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
54.88k
131.36k (x2.39)
Test#2 (FP)
93.17k
198.51k (x2.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.34k
97.27k (x4.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
13.4k (x3.48)
TOTAL
175.24k
440.54k (x2.51)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
24.31k
17.1k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
22.15k
26.59k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.14k
8.91k (x1.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.46k
23.21k (x2.74)
TOTAL
60.06k
75.81k (x1.26)
Multithread
i3-10100T
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
101.48k
172.04k (x1.7)
Test#2 (FP)
98.04k
214.03k (x2.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.28k
97.1k (x4)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
14.57k (x3.77)
TOTAL
227.67k
497.74k (x2.19)
Performance/W
i3-10100T
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
1638 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
2038 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
925 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
4740 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
3799 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
5909 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
1981 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
16847 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4