| | | |

Core i3-10100T vs Ryzen 7 3800X


Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3800X is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the 3800X gets 498.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 3800X is 2.2 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
870f10
Core
Comet Lake-S
Matisse
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
65 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
32768 kB
Date
April 2020
July 2019

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10100T
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
4325
4474 (3.44%)
Test#2 (FP)
15695
17408 (10.91%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5036
8230 (63.42%)
Test#1 (Memory)
7678
25149 (227.54%)
TOTAL
32734
55260 (68.82%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
16586
36101 (117.66%)
Test#2 (FP)
71096
178651 (151.28%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23263
95978 (312.59%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3861
16034 (315.24%)
TOTAL
114806
326764 (184.62%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10100T
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
13839
17175 (24.11%)
Test#2 (FP)
19787
25320 (27.96%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5282
8357 (58.21%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8315
27858 (235.04%)
TOTAL
47222
78708 (66.68%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
54670
136062 (148.88%)
Test#2 (FP)
90708
195062 (115.04%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24109
97815 (305.72%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3855
12912 (234.97%)
TOTAL
173341
441850 (154.90%)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10100T
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
13881
16756 (20.72%)
Test#2 (FP)
20936
25162 (20.19%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5176
8759 (69.23%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8202
24304 (196.32%)
TOTAL
48194
74981 (55.58%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
54878
131363 (139.37%)
Test#2 (FP)
93174
198512 (113.05%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23337
97268 (316.79%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3855
13398 (247.59%)
TOTAL
175244
440541 (151.39%)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
24309
17056 (-29.84%)
Test#2 (FP)
22147
26427 (19.33%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5142
8854 (72.20%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8459
23150 (173.69%)
TOTAL
60056
75487 (25.69%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
101485
172111 (69.59%)
Test#2 (FP)
98041
213728 (118.00%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24281
97111 (299.95%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3863
15813 (309.34%)
TOTAL
227670
498764 (119.07%)

Performance/W
i3-10100T
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
1639 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
2036 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
925 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
151 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
4750 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
3790 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
5873 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
1968 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
5144 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
16775 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9