| | | |

Core i3-10100T vs Ryzen 7 2700X


Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 2700X is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the 2700X gets 433.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.9 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
800f82
Core
Comet Lake-S
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
65 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2020
April 2018

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10100T
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
4325
4255 (-1.62%)
Test#2 (FP)
15695
19716 (25.62%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5036
5841 (15.98%)
Test#1 (Memory)
7678
21357 (178.17%)
TOTAL
32734
51169 (56.32%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
16586
35045 (111.29%)
Test#2 (FP)
71096
181421 (155.18%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23263
64862 (178.83%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3861
8208 (112.58%)
TOTAL
114806
289536 (152.20%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10100T
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
13839
15221 (9.99%)
Test#2 (FP)
19787
24118 (21.89%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5282
5868 (11.09%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8315
21001 (152.57%)
TOTAL
47222
66206 (40.20%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
54670
126815 (131.97%)
Test#2 (FP)
90708
229864 (153.41%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24109
61736 (156.08%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3855
9770 (153.47%)
TOTAL
173341
428186 (147.02%)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10100T
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
13881
14438 (4.02%)
Test#2 (FP)
20936
24922 (19.04%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5176
5804 (12.14%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8202
19072 (132.53%)
TOTAL
48194
64236 (33.29%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
54878
122006 (122.32%)
Test#2 (FP)
93174
220344 (136.49%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23337
59885 (156.61%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3855
9899 (156.81%)
TOTAL
175244
412133 (135.18%)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
24309
15613 (-35.77%)
Test#2 (FP)
22147
26078 (17.75%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5142
5835 (13.48%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8459
18344 (116.87%)
TOTAL
60056
65870 (9.68%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
101485
123326 (21.52%)
Test#2 (FP)
98041
240462 (145.27%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24281
61231 (152.17%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3863
8168 (111.44%)
TOTAL
227670
433187 (90.27%)

Performance/W
i3-10100T
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
1175 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
2290 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
583 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
4126 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
3631 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
6065 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
4266 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
15319 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9