Core i3-10100T vs Ryzen 7 2700X
Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 2700X is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the 2700X gets 433.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.9 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the 2700X gets 433.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.9 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
800f82
Core
Comet Lake-S
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
65 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2020
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
60.06k points
65.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
227.67k points
433.19k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10100T
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
4.32k
4.25k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
15.7k
19.72k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.04k
5.84k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.68k
21.36k (x2.78)
TOTAL
32.73k
51.17k (x1.56)
Multithread
i3-10100T
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
16.59k
35.04k (x2.11)
Test#2 (FP)
71.1k
181.42k (x2.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.26k
64.86k (x2.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
8.21k (x2.13)
TOTAL
114.81k
289.54k (x2.52)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10100T
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
13.84k
15.22k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
19.79k
24.12k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.28k
5.87k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.31k
21k (x2.53)
TOTAL
47.22k
66.21k (x1.4)
Multithread
i3-10100T
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
54.67k
126.81k (x2.32)
Test#2 (FP)
90.71k
229.86k (x2.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.11k
61.74k (x2.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
9.77k (x2.53)
TOTAL
173.34k
428.19k (x2.47)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10100T
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
13.88k
14.44k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
20.94k
24.92k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
5.8k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.2k
19.07k (x2.33)
TOTAL
48.19k
64.24k (x1.33)
Multithread
i3-10100T
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
54.88k
122.01k (x2.22)
Test#2 (FP)
93.17k
220.34k (x2.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.34k
59.89k (x2.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
9.9k (x2.57)
TOTAL
175.24k
412.13k (x2.35)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
24.31k
15.61k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
22.15k
26.08k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.14k
5.84k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.46k
18.34k (x2.17)
TOTAL
60.06k
65.87k (x1.1)
Multithread
i3-10100T
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
101.48k
123.33k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
98.04k
240.46k (x2.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.28k
61.23k (x2.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
8.17k (x2.11)
TOTAL
227.67k
433.19k (x1.9)
Performance/W
i3-10100T
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
1175 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
2290 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
583 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
4126 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
3631 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
6065 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
4266 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
15319 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4