| | | |

Core i3-10100T vs Ryzen 7 1700X


Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 1700X is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the 1700X gets 372.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 1700X is 1.6 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
800f11
Core
Comet Lake-S
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
April 2020
March 2017

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10100T
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
13881
12497 (-9.97%)
Test#2 (FP)
20936
22920 (9.48%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5176
5452 (5.33%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8202
14723 (79.51%)
TOTAL
48194
55592 (15.35%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
54878
92514 (68.58%)
Test#2 (FP)
93174
144762 (55.37%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23337
54429 (133.23%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3855
22078 (472.80%)
TOTAL
175244
313783 (79.06%)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
24309
13723 (-43.55%)
Test#2 (FP)
22147
22479 (1.50%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5142
5123 (-0.38%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8459
15440 (82.53%)
TOTAL
60056
56764 (-5.48%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
101485
110919 (9.30%)
Test#2 (FP)
98041
200559 (104.57%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24281
54243 (123.40%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3863
7005 (81.33%)
TOTAL
227670
372726 (63.71%)

Performance/W
i3-10100T
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
1168 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
2111 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
571 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
74 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
3923 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
3611 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
5916 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
1348 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
4063 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
14938 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9