Core i3-10100T vs Ryzen 5 5625U
Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 5625U is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the 5625U gets 281.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 5625U is 1.2 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the 5625U gets 281.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 5625U is 1.2 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
a50f00
Core
Comet Lake-S
Barcelo
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA1140-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
60.06k points
70.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
227.67k points
281.26k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
24.31k
18.57k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
22.15k
22.03k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.14k
9.55k (x1.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.46k
20.5k (x2.42)
TOTAL
60.06k
70.65k (x1.18)
Multithread
i3-10100T
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
101.48k
92.92k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
98.04k
128.4k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.28k
54.82k (x2.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
5.13k (x1.33)
TOTAL
227.67k
281.26k (x1.24)
Performance/W
i3-10100T
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
6194 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
8560 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
3654 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
342 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
18750 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
4318 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
5124 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
2221 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
4768 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
16431 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4