Core i3-10100T vs Ryzen 5 5600H
Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 5600H is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the 5600H gets 255.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600H is 1.1 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the 5600H gets 255.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600H is 1.1 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
a50f00
Core
Comet Lake-S
Cezanne
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2020
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
60.06k points
53.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
227.67k points
255.19k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
24.31k
14.34k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
22.15k
17.67k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.14k
6.41k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.46k
14.95k (x1.77)
TOTAL
60.06k
53.37k (x0.89)
Multithread
i3-10100T
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
101.48k
83.58k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
98.04k
119.22k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.28k
48.56k (x2)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
3.83k (x0.99)
TOTAL
227.67k
255.19k (x1.12)
Performance/W
i3-10100T
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
1857 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
2649 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
1079 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
85 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
5671 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
3413 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
4207 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
1527 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
3560 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
12707 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4