| | | |

Core i3-10100T vs Ryzen 5 3550H


Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3550H is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the 3550H gets 177.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 1.3 times faster than the 3550H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
810f81
Core
Comet Lake-S
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2019

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10100T
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
4325
3632 (-16.02%)
Test#2 (FP)
15695
16695 (6.37%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5036
4916 (-2.38%)
Test#1 (Memory)
7678
5002 (-34.86%)
TOTAL
32734
30244 (-7.61%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
16586
13621 (-17.88%)
Test#2 (FP)
71096
65711 (-7.57%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23263
23698 (1.87%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3861
5637 (45.99%)
TOTAL
114806
108667 (-5.35%)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
24309
13828 (-43.11%)
Test#2 (FP)
22147
22579 (1.95%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5142
5086 (-1.08%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8459
5028 (-40.56%)
TOTAL
60056
46522 (-22.54%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
101485
51253 (-49.50%)
Test#2 (FP)
98041
95055 (-3.05%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24281
25487 (4.97%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3863
5683 (47.10%)
TOTAL
227670
177477 (-22.05%)

Performance/W
i3-10100T
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
1464 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
2716 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
728 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
5071 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
3737 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
6103 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
1375 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
1359 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
12574 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9