| | | |

Core i3-10100T vs Ryzen 5 3500U


Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3500U is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the 3500U gets 151.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 1.5 times faster than the 3500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
810f81
Core
Comet Lake-S
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2019

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10100T
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
4325
3241 (-25.05%)
Test#2 (FP)
15695
13158 (-16.16%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5036
4406 (-12.51%)
Test#1 (Memory)
7678
3317 (-56.80%)
TOTAL
32734
24123 (-26.31%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
16586
12951 (-21.92%)
Test#2 (FP)
71096
57845 (-18.64%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23263
21052 (-9.50%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3861
3508 (-9.15%)
TOTAL
114806
95355 (-16.94%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10100T
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
13839
11980 (-13.43%)
Test#2 (FP)
19787
15846 (-19.92%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5282
4529 (-14.26%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8315
3293 (-60.40%)
TOTAL
47222
35647 (-24.51%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
54670
48283 (-11.68%)
Test#2 (FP)
90708
74193 (-18.21%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24109
23289 (-3.40%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3855
3465 (-10.10%)
TOTAL
173341
149230 (-13.91%)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10100T
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
13881
11104 (-20.00%)
Test#2 (FP)
20936
18975 (-9.37%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5176
3898 (-24.70%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8202
3391 (-58.66%)
TOTAL
48194
37368 (-22.46%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
54878
45738 (-16.65%)
Test#2 (FP)
93174
75475 (-19.00%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23337
21888 (-6.21%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3855
3495 (-9.33%)
TOTAL
175244
146595 (-16.35%)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
24309
11012 (-54.70%)
Test#2 (FP)
22147
18509 (-16.43%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5142
4390 (-14.62%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8459
3408 (-59.71%)
TOTAL
60056
37320 (-37.86%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
101485
46144 (-54.53%)
Test#2 (FP)
98041
79008 (-19.41%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24281
22265 (-8.30%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3863
3689 (-4.50%)
TOTAL
227670
151106 (-33.63%)

Performance/W
i3-10100T
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
3076 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
5267 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
1484 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
246 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
10074 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
2976 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
5002 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
1187 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
921 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
10086 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9