| | | |

Core i3-10100T vs Ryzen 5 2400G


Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 1.1 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
810f10
Core
Comet Lake-S
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2018

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10100T
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
4325
3800 (-12.14%)
Test#2 (FP)
15695
17383 (10.75%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5036
5170 (2.67%)
Test#1 (Memory)
7678
3164 (-58.79%)
TOTAL
32734
29517 (-9.83%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
16586
15275 (-7.90%)
Test#2 (FP)
71096
76437 (7.51%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23263
27476 (18.11%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3861
3015 (-21.91%)
TOTAL
114806
122203 (6.44%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10100T
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
13839
13950 (0.80%)
Test#2 (FP)
19787
20702 (4.63%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5282
5331 (0.92%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8315
3026 (-63.61%)
TOTAL
47222
43009 (-8.92%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
54670
58562 (7.12%)
Test#2 (FP)
90708
92948 (2.47%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24109
28553 (18.44%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3855
2975 (-22.81%)
TOTAL
173341
183039 (5.59%)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10100T
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
13881
13039 (-6.06%)
Test#2 (FP)
20936
22350 (6.75%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5176
5366 (3.68%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8202
3398 (-58.57%)
TOTAL
48194
44153 (-8.39%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
54878
56494 (2.95%)
Test#2 (FP)
93174
100740 (8.12%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23337
28212 (20.89%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3855
3041 (-21.12%)
TOTAL
175244
188486 (7.56%)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
24309
14200 (-41.58%)
Test#2 (FP)
22147
23234 (4.91%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5142
5352 (4.08%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8459
5176 (-38.81%)
TOTAL
60056
47961 (-20.14%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
101485
58236 (-42.62%)
Test#2 (FP)
98041
105716 (7.83%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24281
28732 (18.33%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3863
5587 (44.62%)
TOTAL
227670
198270 (-12.91%)

Performance/W
i3-10100T
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
896 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
1626 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
442 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
3050 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
3641 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
12298 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9