Core i3-10100T vs Ryzen 5 2400G
Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 1.1 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 1.1 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
810f10
Core
Comet Lake-S
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
60.06k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
227.67k points
198.27k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10100T
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
4.32k
3.8k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
15.7k
17.38k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.04k
5.17k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.68k
3.16k (x0.41)
TOTAL
32.73k
29.52k (x0.9)
Multithread
i3-10100T
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
16.59k
15.28k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
71.1k
76.44k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.26k
27.48k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
3.02k (x0.78)
TOTAL
114.81k
122.2k (x1.06)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10100T
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
13.84k
13.95k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
19.79k
20.7k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.28k
5.33k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.31k
3.03k (x0.36)
TOTAL
47.22k
43.01k (x0.91)
Multithread
i3-10100T
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
54.67k
58.56k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
90.71k
92.95k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.11k
28.55k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
2.98k (x0.77)
TOTAL
173.34k
183.04k (x1.06)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10100T
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
13.88k
13.04k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
20.94k
22.35k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
5.37k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.2k
3.4k (x0.41)
TOTAL
48.19k
44.15k (x0.92)
Multithread
i3-10100T
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
54.88k
56.49k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
93.17k
100.74k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.34k
28.21k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
3.04k (x0.79)
TOTAL
175.24k
188.49k (x1.08)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
24.31k
14.2k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
22.15k
23.23k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.14k
5.35k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.46k
5.18k (x0.61)
TOTAL
60.06k
47.96k (x0.8)
Multithread
i3-10100T
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
101.48k
58.24k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
98.04k
105.72k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.28k
28.73k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
5.59k (x1.45)
TOTAL
227.67k
198.27k (x0.87)
Performance/W
i3-10100T
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
896 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
1626 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
442 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
3050 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
3641 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
12298 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4