| | | |

Core i3-10100T vs Ryzen 3 3200U


Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3200U is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the 3200U gets 52.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 4.3 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
810f81
Core
Comet Lake-S
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2019

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
24309
12389 (-49.03%)
Test#2 (FP)
22147
20635 (-6.83%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5142
4568 (-11.17%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8459
3850 (-54.49%)
TOTAL
60056
41442 (-31.00%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
101485
14983 (-85.24%)
Test#2 (FP)
98041
24400 (-75.11%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24281
9276 (-61.80%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3863
4008 (3.76%)
TOTAL
227670
52667 (-76.87%)

Performance/W
i3-10100T
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
999 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
1627 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
618 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
267 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
3511 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
3540 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
5896 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
1305 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
1100 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
11840 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9