| | | |

Core i3-10100T vs Ryzen 3 3200G


Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the 3200G gets 176.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 1.3 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
810f81
Core
Comet Lake-S
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2020
July 2019

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10100T
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
4325
3890 (-10.05%)
Test#2 (FP)
15695
17944 (14.33%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5036
5338 (6.01%)
Test#1 (Memory)
7678
6616 (-13.83%)
TOTAL
32734
33789 (3.22%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
16586
15068 (-9.15%)
Test#2 (FP)
71096
66845 (-5.98%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23263
19560 (-15.92%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3861
6541 (69.41%)
TOTAL
114806
108015 (-5.92%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10100T
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
13839
14296 (3.30%)
Test#2 (FP)
19787
21686 (9.60%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5282
5417 (2.55%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8315
6601 (-20.61%)
TOTAL
47222
48000 (1.65%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
54670
55447 (1.42%)
Test#2 (FP)
90708
83131 (-8.35%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24109
20757 (-13.90%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3855
6576 (70.59%)
TOTAL
173341
165910 (-4.29%)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10100T
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
13881
13047 (-6.01%)
Test#2 (FP)
20936
22878 (9.28%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5176
5391 (4.16%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8202
7311 (-10.86%)
TOTAL
48194
48627 (0.90%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
54878
51730 (-5.74%)
Test#2 (FP)
93174
87745 (-5.83%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23337
20744 (-11.11%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3855
6571 (70.46%)
TOTAL
175244
166789 (-4.82%)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
24309
14589 (-39.98%)
Test#2 (FP)
22147
23951 (8.14%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5142
5424 (5.47%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8459
6541 (-22.67%)
TOTAL
60056
50504 (-15.91%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
101485
56613 (-44.22%)
Test#2 (FP)
98041
92186 (-5.97%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24281
20909 (-13.89%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3863
6640 (71.89%)
TOTAL
227670
176348 (-22.54%)

Performance/W
i3-10100T
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
871 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
1418 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
322 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
102 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
2713 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
3647 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
5988 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
1356 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
1635 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
12626 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9