| | | |

Core i3-10100T vs Ryzen 3 2200G


Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 2200G is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the 2200G gets 157.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 1.4 times faster than the 2200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
810f10
Core
Comet Lake-S
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2020
February 2018

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
24309
13748 (-43.45%)
Test#2 (FP)
22147
22577 (1.94%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5142
4993 (-2.89%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8459
3547 (-58.06%)
TOTAL
60056
44865 (-25.29%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
101485
50995 (-49.75%)
Test#2 (FP)
98041
84402 (-13.91%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24281
18950 (-21.96%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3863
3196 (-17.26%)
TOTAL
227670
157543 (-30.80%)

Performance/W
i3-10100T
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
785 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
1298 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
292 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
49 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
2424 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
3716 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
6102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
1350 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
959 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
12126 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9