| | | |

Core i3-10100T vs Phenom II X6 1035T


Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 1035T is based on K10.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 173.3 k points while the 1035T gets 80.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 2.2 times faster than the 1035T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
100fa0
Core
Comet Lake-S
Thuban
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
Socket AM3
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/6
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
128 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2020
May 2010

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10100T
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
4325
1981 (-54.20%)
Test#2 (FP)
15695
4569 (-70.89%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5036
2572 (-48.93%)
Test#1 (Memory)
7678
3514 (-54.23%)
TOTAL
32734
12636 (-61.40%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
16586
11863 (-28.48%)
Test#2 (FP)
71096
27404 (-61.46%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23263
15390 (-33.84%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3861
3456 (-10.49%)
TOTAL
114806
58113 (-49.38%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10100T
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
13839
5170 (-62.64%)
Test#2 (FP)
19787
5326 (-73.08%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5282
2759 (-47.77%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8315
3513 (-57.75%)
TOTAL
47222
16769 (-64.49%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
54670
29823 (-45.45%)
Test#2 (FP)
90708
30789 (-66.06%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24109
15882 (-34.12%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3855
3691 (-4.23%)
TOTAL
173341
80186 (-53.74%)

Performance/W
i3-10100T
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
841 points/W
314 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1396 points/W
324 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
371 points/W
167 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
2667 points/W
844 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
3218 points/GHz
1668 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4602 points/GHz
1718 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1228 points/GHz
890 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1934 points/GHz
1133 points/GHz
TOTAL
10982 points/GHz
5409 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9