Core i3-10100T vs FX 9590
Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 9590 is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 175.2 k points while the 9590 gets 137.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 1.3 times faster than the 9590. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 175.2 k points while the 9590 gets 137.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 1.3 times faster than the 9590. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
600f20
Core
Comet Lake-S
Vishera
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/8
TDP
65 W
220 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x2048 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2020
July 2013
Mean monothread perf.
60.06k points
32.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
227.67k points
137.65k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10100T
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
13.88k
11.51k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
20.94k
9.57k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
4.19k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.2k
7.14k (x0.87)
TOTAL
48.19k
32.41k (x0.67)
Multithread
i3-10100T
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
54.88k
55.13k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
93.17k
51.69k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.34k
27.02k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
3.81k (x0.99)
TOTAL
175.24k
137.65k (x0.79)
Performance/W
i3-10100T
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
844 points/W
251 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1433 points/W
235 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
359 points/W
123 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
17 points/W
TOTAL
2696 points/W
626 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
3228 points/GHz
2302 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4869 points/GHz
1914 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1204 points/GHz
837 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1907 points/GHz
1429 points/GHz
TOTAL
11208 points/GHz
6482 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4