| | | |

Core i3-10100T vs FX 8350


Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 8350 is based on Piledriver.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 175.2 k points while the 8350 gets 117.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 1.5 times faster than the 8350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
600f20
Core
Comet Lake-S
Vishera
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/8
TDP
65 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x2048 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2020
October 2012

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10100T
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
13881
9847 (-29.06%)
Test#2 (FP)
20936
8418 (-59.79%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5176
3576 (-30.92%)
Test#1 (Memory)
8202
6267 (-23.59%)
TOTAL
48194
28107 (-41.68%)

Multithread

i3-10100T

8350
Test#1 (Integers)
54878
44810 (-18.35%)
Test#2 (FP)
93174
45461 (-51.21%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23337
22736 (-2.58%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3855
4898 (27.06%)
TOTAL
175244
117904 (-32.72%)

Performance/W
i3-10100T
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
844 points/W
358 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1433 points/W
364 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
359 points/W
182 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
2696 points/W
943 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
3228 points/GHz
2402 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4869 points/GHz
2053 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1204 points/GHz
872 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1907 points/GHz
1528 points/GHz
TOTAL
11208 points/GHz
6855 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9