Core i3-10100T vs Athlon X4 760K
Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 760K is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 175.2 k points while the 760K gets 49.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 3.5 times faster than the 760K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 175.2 k points while the 760K gets 49.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 3.5 times faster than the 760K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
610f31
Core
Comet Lake-S
Richland
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
Socket FM2
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
65 W
100 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x16+2x64 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x2048 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
kB
Date
April 2020
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
60.06k points
24.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
227.67k points
49.8k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10100T
760K
Test#1 (Integers)
13.88k
9.53k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
20.94k
8.14k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
3.45k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.2k
3.48k (x0.42)
TOTAL
48.19k
24.6k (x0.51)
Multithread
i3-10100T
760K
Test#1 (Integers)
54.88k
18.2k (x0.33)
Test#2 (FP)
93.17k
19.33k (x0.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.34k
8.42k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
3.86k (x1)
TOTAL
175.24k
49.8k (x0.28)
Performance/W
i3-10100T
760K
Test#1 (Integers)
844 points/W
182 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1433 points/W
193 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
359 points/W
84 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
2696 points/W
498 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
760K
Test#1 (Integers)
3228 points/GHz
2324 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4869 points/GHz
1986 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1204 points/GHz
842 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1907 points/GHz
849 points/GHz
TOTAL
11208 points/GHz
6001 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4