| | | | | | |

Core i3-10100T vs i5-12500H


Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-12500H is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the i5-12500H gets 225.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 1 times faster than the i5-12500H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
906a3
Core
Comet Lake-S
Alder Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
4/8
12/16
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x1280/2x2048 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
18432 kB
Date
April 2020
February 2022
Mean monothread perf.
60.06k points
58.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
227.67k points
225.65k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10100T
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
4.32k
6.93k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
15.7k
18.76k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.04k
9.46k (x1.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.68k
8.17k (x1.06)
TOTAL
32.73k
43.33k (x1.32)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.59k
18.04k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
71.1k
66.78k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.26k
37.55k (x1.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
6.08k (x1.57)
TOTAL
114.81k
128.45k (x1.12)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.84k
21.93k (x1.58)
Test#2 (FP)
19.79k
18.79k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.28k
10.5k (x1.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.31k
8.11k (x0.98)
TOTAL
47.22k
59.33k (x1.26)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
54.67k
61.07k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
90.71k
86.08k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.11k
41.08k (x1.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
6.02k (x1.56)
TOTAL
173.34k
194.25k (x1.12)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.88k
21.11k (x1.52)
Test#2 (FP)
20.94k
19.61k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
9.53k (x1.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.2k
7.72k (x0.94)
TOTAL
48.19k
57.97k (x1.2)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
54.88k
61.44k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
93.17k
93.66k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.34k
40.09k (x1.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
6.01k (x1.56)
TOTAL
175.24k
201.2k (x1.15)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
24.31k
22.61k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
22.15k
17.73k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.14k
9.63k (x1.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.46k
8.4k (x0.99)
TOTAL
60.06k
58.37k (x0.97)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
101.48k
85.49k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
98.04k
94.93k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.28k
39.15k (x1.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
6.08k (x1.57)
TOTAL
227.67k
225.65k (x0.99)

Performance/W
i3-10100T
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
1900 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
2110 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
870 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
135 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
5014 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
5025 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
3939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
2139 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
1867 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
12971 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4