| | | | | | |

Core i3-10100T vs i7-1185G7


Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-1185G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the i7-1185G7 gets 230.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1185G7 is 1 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
806c1
Core
Comet Lake-S
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
65 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
60.06k points
60.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
227.67k points
230.91k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
24.31k
24.35k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
22.15k
20.07k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.14k
8.61k (x1.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.46k
7.84k (x0.93)
TOTAL
60.06k
60.87k (x1.01)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
101.48k
93.58k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
98.04k
94.71k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.28k
33.28k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
9.34k (x2.42)
TOTAL
227.67k
230.91k (x1.01)

Performance/W
i3-10100T
i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
3342 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
3383 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
1189 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
334 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
8247 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
5074 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
4182 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
1793 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
1633 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
12682 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4