| | | | | | |

Core i3-10100T vs i7-11700F


Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-11700F is based on Rocket Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the i7-11700F gets 512.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11700F is 2.2 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
a0671
Core
Comet Lake-S
Rocket Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2020
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
60.06k points
89.58k points
Mean multithread perf.
227.67k points
512.32k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
24.31k
32.55k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
22.15k
26.95k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.14k
10.76k (x2.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.46k
19.32k (x2.28)
TOTAL
60.06k
89.58k (x1.49)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
101.48k
232.06k (x2.29)
Test#2 (FP)
98.04k
203.56k (x2.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.28k
72.89k (x3)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
3.81k (x0.99)
TOTAL
227.67k
512.32k (x2.25)

Performance/W
i3-10100T
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
3570 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
3132 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
1121 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
7882 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
6642 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
2196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
3943 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
18281 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4