| | | | | | |

Core i3-10100T vs i7-1165G7


Description
The i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100T gets a score of 227.7 k points while the i7-1165G7 gets 210.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 1.1 times faster than the i7-1165G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
806c1
Core
Comet Lake-S
Tiger Lake-UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
65 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
60.06k points
62.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
227.67k points
210.4k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10100T
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
4.32k
4.26k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
15.7k
19.54k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.04k
10.95k (x2.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.68k
11.08k (x1.44)
TOTAL
32.73k
45.84k (x1.4)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
16.59k
15.69k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
71.1k
68.3k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.26k
33.66k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
12.16k (x3.15)
TOTAL
114.81k
129.81k (x1.13)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
13.84k
14.48k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
19.79k
24.18k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.28k
11.95k (x2.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.31k
11.01k (x1.32)
TOTAL
47.22k
61.62k (x1.3)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
54.67k
50.98k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
90.71k
80.7k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.11k
36.61k (x1.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
12.02k (x3.12)
TOTAL
173.34k
180.32k (x1.04)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
13.88k
16.27k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
20.94k
25.74k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
11.5k (x2.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.2k
10.82k (x1.32)
TOTAL
48.19k
64.32k (x1.33)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
54.88k
54k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
93.17k
88.76k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.34k
35.23k (x1.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
12.14k (x3.15)
TOTAL
175.24k
190.12k (x1.08)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100T
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
24.31k
22.97k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
22.15k
21.61k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.14k
8.99k (x1.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.46k
8.52k (x1.01)
TOTAL
60.06k
62.1k (x1.03)

Multithread

i3-10100T

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
101.48k
82.75k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
98.04k
86.58k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.28k
29.34k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
11.72k (x3.03)
TOTAL
227.67k
210.4k (x0.92)

Performance/W
i3-10100T
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
1561 points/W
2955 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1508 points/W
3092 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
374 points/W
1048 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
419 points/W
TOTAL
3503 points/W
7514 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10100T
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
5653 points/GHz
4887 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5150 points/GHz
4599 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1196 points/GHz
1912 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1967 points/GHz
1813 points/GHz
TOTAL
13967 points/GHz
13212 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4