Core i3-10100 vs Ryzen 3 1200
Description
The i3-10100 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 1200 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100 gets a score of 162.3 k points while the 1200 gets 117.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10100 is 1.4 times faster than the 1200. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10100 gets a score of 162.3 k points while the 1200 gets 117.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10100 is 1.4 times faster than the 1200. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
800f11
Core
Comet Lake-S
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2020
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
55.41k points
37.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
162.33k points
117.81k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10100
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
22.74k
11.73k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
20.31k
18.85k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.71k
4.22k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.65k
2.76k (x0.36)
TOTAL
55.41k
37.55k (x0.68)
Multithread
i3-10100
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
71.95k
38.56k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
67.7k
62.21k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.43k
13.7k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.25k
3.33k (x0.53)
TOTAL
162.33k
117.81k (x0.73)
Performance/W
i3-10100
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
1107 points/W
593 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1042 points/W
957 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
253 points/W
211 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
96 points/W
51 points/W
TOTAL
2497 points/W
1812 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10100
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
5288 points/GHz
3449 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4724 points/GHz
5544 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1095 points/GHz
1242 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1779 points/GHz
810 points/GHz
TOTAL
12886 points/GHz
11045 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4