Core i3-1005G1 vs i7-4820K
Description
The i3-1005G1 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i7-4820K is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1005G1 gets a score of 98.9 k points while the i7-4820K gets 134.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4820K is 1.4 times faster than the i3-1005G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1005G1 gets a score of 98.9 k points while the i7-4820K gets 134.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4820K is 1.4 times faster than the i3-1005G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706e5
306e4
Core
Ice Lake-U
Ivy Bridge -E
Base frecuency
1.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
August 2019
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
50.62k points
32.49k points
Mean multithread perf.
116.63k points
134.08k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-1005G1
i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
11.93k
11.85k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
16.99k
11.84k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.43k
4.69k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.59k
4.12k (x0.9)
TOTAL
39.93k
32.49k (x0.81)
Multithread
i3-1005G1
i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
29.07k
47.65k (x1.64)
Test#2 (FP)
46.14k
54.81k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.47k
21.56k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.18k
10.05k (x2.4)
TOTAL
98.86k
134.08k (x1.36)
Performance/W
i3-1005G1
i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
1938 points/W
367 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3076 points/W
422 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1298 points/W
166 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
279 points/W
77 points/W
TOTAL
6591 points/W
1031 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-1005G1
i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
3510 points/GHz
3039 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4996 points/GHz
3035 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1890 points/GHz
1201 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1349 points/GHz
1056 points/GHz
TOTAL
11745 points/GHz
8331 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4