| | | | | | |

Core i3-1005G1 vs i5-10210U


Description
The i3-1005G1 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1005G1 gets a score of 116.6 k points while the i5-10210U gets 145.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10210U is 1.2 times faster than the i3-1005G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
806ec
Core
Ice Lake-U
Comet Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.2 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
August 2019
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
50.62k points
55.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
116.63k points
145.51k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1005G1
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
19.45k
23.11k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
16.75k
20.58k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.04k
4.73k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.38k
7.43k (x1.16)
TOTAL
50.62k
55.86k (x1.1)

Multithread

i3-1005G1

i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
46.52k
65.84k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
48.76k
60.77k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.12k
14.45k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.23k
4.44k (x1.05)
TOTAL
116.63k
145.51k (x1.25)

Performance/W
i3-1005G1
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
3102 points/W
4389 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3251 points/W
4052 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1141 points/W
964 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
282 points/W
296 points/W
TOTAL
7776 points/W
9701 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1005G1
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
5721 points/GHz
5503 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4926 points/GHz
4900 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2365 points/GHz
1127 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1877 points/GHz
1769 points/GHz
TOTAL
14889 points/GHz
13299 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4