| | | | | | |

Core i3-1005G1 vs Ryzen 3 5300U


Description
The i3-1005G1 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the 5300U is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1005G1 gets a score of 116.6 k points while the 5300U gets 198.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 5300U is 1.7 times faster than the i3-1005G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
860f81
Core
Ice Lake-U
Lucienne
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.2 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2019
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
50.62k points
52.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
116.63k points
198.38k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1005G1
5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
19.45k
15.09k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
16.75k
23.74k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.04k
8.32k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.38k
5.19k (x0.81)
TOTAL
50.62k
52.35k (x1.03)

Multithread

i3-1005G1

5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
46.52k
67k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
48.76k
89.94k (x1.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.12k
36.84k (x2.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.23k
4.6k (x1.09)
TOTAL
116.63k
198.38k (x1.7)

Performance/W
i3-1005G1
5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
3102 points/W
4467 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3251 points/W
5996 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1141 points/W
2456 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
282 points/W
307 points/W
TOTAL
7776 points/W
13226 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1005G1
5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
5721 points/GHz
3972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4926 points/GHz
6246 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2365 points/GHz
2190 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1877 points/GHz
1367 points/GHz
TOTAL
14889 points/GHz
13775 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4