Core i3-1005G1 vs A9 9420
Description
The i3-1005G1 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the 9420 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1005G1 gets a score of 116.6 k points while the 9420 gets 46.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1005G1 is 2.5 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1005G1 gets a score of 116.6 k points while the 9420 gets 46.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1005G1 is 2.5 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706e5
670f00
Core
Ice Lake-U
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
1.2 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
Micro-BGA
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
0 kB
Date
August 2019
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
50.62k points
33.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
116.63k points
46.33k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-1005G1
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
3.07k
2.56k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
13.76k
9.97k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8k
2.96k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.59k
2.12k (x0.32)
TOTAL
31.42k
17.61k (x0.56)
Multithread
i3-1005G1
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
8k
3.88k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
35.53k
9.26k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.53k
3.9k (x0.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.3k
1.74k (x0.4)
TOTAL
66.36k
18.79k (x0.28)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-1005G1
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
10.52k
8.41k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
17.6k
11.48k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.76k
3.29k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.55k
2.24k (x0.34)
TOTAL
43.44k
25.41k (x0.59)
Multithread
i3-1005G1
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
26.86k
11.25k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
42.38k
13.69k (x0.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.65k
2.09k (x0.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.21k
1.87k (x0.44)
TOTAL
94.1k
28.89k (x0.31)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-1005G1
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
11.93k
7.55k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
16.99k
13.9k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.43k
3.11k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.59k
2.18k (x0.47)
TOTAL
39.93k
26.74k (x0.67)
Multithread
i3-1005G1
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
29.07k
9.09k (x0.31)
Test#2 (FP)
46.14k
12.25k (x0.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.47k
3k (x0.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.18k
1.81k (x0.43)
TOTAL
98.86k
26.15k (x0.26)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1005G1
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
19.45k
11.74k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
16.75k
16.05k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.04k
3.26k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.38k
2.05k (x0.32)
TOTAL
50.62k
33.09k (x0.65)
Multithread
i3-1005G1
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
46.52k
18.57k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
48.76k
20.11k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.12k
5.27k (x0.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.23k
2.38k (x0.56)
TOTAL
116.63k
46.33k (x0.4)
Performance/W
i3-1005G1
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
3102 points/W
1238 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3251 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1141 points/W
352 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
282 points/W
159 points/W
TOTAL
7776 points/W
3089 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-1005G1
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
5721 points/GHz
3260 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4926 points/GHz
4458 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2365 points/GHz
905 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1877 points/GHz
570 points/GHz
TOTAL
14889 points/GHz
9192 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4