Core M-5Y10c vs i7-7700HQ
Description
The M-5Y10c is based on Broadwell architecture while the i7-7700HQ is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the M-5Y10c gets a score of 51 k points while the i7-7700HQ gets 169.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7700HQ is 3.3 times faster than the M-5Y10c . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the M-5Y10c gets a score of 51 k points while the i7-7700HQ gets 169.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7700HQ is 3.3 times faster than the M-5Y10c . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306d4
906e9
Core
Broadwell-Y
Kaby Lake-H
Base frecuency
0.8 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
5 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
October 2014
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
22.93k points
56.29k points
Mean multithread perf.
51k points
208.33k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
M-5Y10c
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
7.22k
13k (x1.8)
Test#2 (FP)
9.98k
20.34k (x2.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
4.77k (x1.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
6.95k (x2.33)
TOTAL
22.93k
45.05k (x1.96)
Multithread
M-5Y10c
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
15.07k
52.7k (x3.5)
Test#2 (FP)
24.8k
89.69k (x3.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.68k
22.49k (x3.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.46k
4.3k (x0.96)
TOTAL
51k
169.17k (x3.32)
Performance/W
M-5Y10c
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3014 points/W
1171 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4960 points/W
1993 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1335 points/W
500 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
891 points/W
95 points/W
TOTAL
10200 points/W
3759 points/W
Performance/GHz
M-5Y10c
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3611 points/GHz
3421 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4990 points/GHz
5351 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1374 points/GHz
1255 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1492 points/GHz
1829 points/GHz
TOTAL
11467 points/GHz
11857 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4