Core M-5Y10c vs FX 6100
Description
The M-5Y10c is based on Broadwell architecture while the 6100 is based on Bulldozer.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the M-5Y10c gets a score of 51 k points while the 6100 gets 65.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 6100 is 1.3 times faster than the M-5Y10c . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the M-5Y10c gets a score of 51 k points while the 6100 gets 65.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 6100 is 1.3 times faster than the M-5Y10c . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306d4
600f12
Core
Broadwell-Y
Zambezi
Base frecuency
0.8 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/6
TDP
5 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
3x64+6x16 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
3x2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
October 2014
October 2011
Mean monothread perf.
22.93k points
20.42k points
Mean multithread perf.
51k points
65.32k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
M-5Y10c
6100
Test#1 (Integers)
7.22k
7.15k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
9.98k
6.53k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
2.55k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
4.2k (x1.41)
TOTAL
22.93k
20.42k (x0.89)
Multithread
M-5Y10c
6100
Test#1 (Integers)
15.07k
24.5k (x1.63)
Test#2 (FP)
24.8k
23.85k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.68k
13.45k (x2.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.46k
3.51k (x0.79)
TOTAL
51k
65.32k (x1.28)
Performance/W
M-5Y10c
6100
Test#1 (Integers)
3014 points/W
258 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4960 points/W
251 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1335 points/W
142 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
891 points/W
37 points/W
TOTAL
10200 points/W
688 points/W
Performance/GHz
M-5Y10c
6100
Test#1 (Integers)
3611 points/GHz
1832 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4990 points/GHz
1673 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1374 points/GHz
653 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1492 points/GHz
1077 points/GHz
TOTAL
11467 points/GHz
5235 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4