Celeron N5105 vs Core i7-10750H
Description
The N5105 is based on Tremont architecture while the i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5105 gets a score of 64.1 k points while the i7-10750H gets 207.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 3.2 times faster than the N5105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5105 gets a score of 64.1 k points while the i7-10750H gets 207.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 3.2 times faster than the N5105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906c0
a0652
Core
Jasper Lake
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1338
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
10 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
1536 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2021
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
27.1k points
75.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
64.09k points
349.21k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5105
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
9.83k
16.63k (x1.69)
Test#2 (FP)
9.74k
24.17k (x2.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.65k
6.38k (x1.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
13.69k (x3.53)
TOTAL
27.1k
60.87k (x2.25)
Multithread
N5105
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
25.04k
67.07k (x2.68)
Test#2 (FP)
24.7k
107.95k (x4.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.29k
27.05k (x2.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.06k
5.07k (x1)
TOTAL
64.09k
207.14k (x3.23)
Performance/W
N5105
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
2504 points/W
1490 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2470 points/W
2399 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
929 points/W
601 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
506 points/W
113 points/W
TOTAL
6409 points/W
4603 points/W
Performance/GHz
N5105
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3388 points/GHz
3325 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3358 points/GHz
4834 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1259 points/GHz
1277 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1338 points/GHz
2738 points/GHz
TOTAL
9344 points/GHz
12174 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4