Celeron N5105 vs Core i5-10500H
Description
The N5105 is based on Tremont architecture while the i5-10500H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5105 gets a score of 64.1 k points while the i5-10500H gets 290.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500H is 4.5 times faster than the N5105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5105 gets a score of 64.1 k points while the i5-10500H gets 290.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500H is 4.5 times faster than the N5105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906c0
a0652
Core
Jasper Lake
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1338
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
10 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
1536 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2021
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
27.1k points
72.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
64.09k points
378.99k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5105
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
9.83k
15.89k (x1.62)
Test#2 (FP)
9.74k
22.74k (x2.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.65k
6.09k (x1.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
12.49k (x3.22)
TOTAL
27.1k
57.21k (x2.11)
Multithread
N5105
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
25.04k
96.8k (x3.87)
Test#2 (FP)
24.7k
149.1k (x6.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.29k
39.68k (x4.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.06k
5.28k (x1.04)
TOTAL
64.09k
290.85k (x4.54)
Performance/W
N5105
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
2504 points/W
1489 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2470 points/W
2294 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
929 points/W
610 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
506 points/W
81 points/W
TOTAL
6409 points/W
4475 points/W
Performance/GHz
N5105
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
3388 points/GHz
3531 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3358 points/GHz
5054 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1259 points/GHz
1353 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1338 points/GHz
2776 points/GHz
TOTAL
9344 points/GHz
12713 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4