Celeron N5105 vs Core i5-1035G4
Description
The N5105 is based on Tremont architecture while the i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5105 gets a score of 64.1 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 87.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1035G4 is 1.4 times faster than the N5105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5105 gets a score of 64.1 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 87.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1035G4 is 1.4 times faster than the N5105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906c0
706e5
Core
Jasper Lake
Ice Lake-U
Base frecuency
2 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1338
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
10 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
1536 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2021
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
27.1k points
65.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
64.09k points
142.69k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5105
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
9.83k
7.07k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
9.74k
10.55k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.65k
5.27k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
5.66k (x1.46)
TOTAL
27.1k
28.56k (x1.05)
Multithread
N5105
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
25.04k
25.28k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
24.7k
37.48k (x1.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.29k
17.77k (x1.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.06k
6.92k (x1.37)
TOTAL
64.09k
87.45k (x1.36)
Performance/W
N5105
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
2504 points/W
1685 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2470 points/W
2499 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
929 points/W
1185 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
506 points/W
461 points/W
TOTAL
6409 points/W
5830 points/W
Performance/GHz
N5105
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3388 points/GHz
1910 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3358 points/GHz
2852 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1259 points/GHz
1424 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1338 points/GHz
1531 points/GHz
TOTAL
9344 points/GHz
7718 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4