Celeron N5105 vs Core i3-10110U
Description
The N5105 is based on Tremont architecture while the i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5105 gets a score of 64.1 k points while the i3-10110U gets 80.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10110U is 1.3 times faster than the N5105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5105 gets a score of 64.1 k points while the i3-10110U gets 80.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10110U is 1.3 times faster than the N5105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906c0
806ec
Core
Jasper Lake
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1338
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
10 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1536 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2021
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
27.1k points
56.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
64.09k points
106.58k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5105
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
9.83k
14.3k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
9.74k
20.09k (x2.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.65k
5.23k (x1.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
4.24k (x1.09)
TOTAL
27.1k
43.87k (x1.62)
Multithread
N5105
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
25.04k
25.51k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
24.7k
41.33k (x1.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.29k
10.81k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.06k
3.21k (x0.63)
TOTAL
64.09k
80.85k (x1.26)
Performance/W
N5105
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
2504 points/W
1700 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2470 points/W
2755 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
929 points/W
721 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
506 points/W
214 points/W
TOTAL
6409 points/W
5390 points/W
Performance/GHz
N5105
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
3388 points/GHz
3487 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3358 points/GHz
4901 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1259 points/GHz
1277 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1338 points/GHz
1035 points/GHz
TOTAL
9344 points/GHz
10699 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4