Celeron N5105 vs J4105
Description
The N5105 is based on Tremont architecture while the J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5105 gets a score of 64.1 k points while the J4105 gets 61.5 k points.
Summarizing, the N5105 is 1 times faster than the J4105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5105 gets a score of 64.1 k points while the J4105 gets 61.5 k points.
Summarizing, the N5105 is 1 times faster than the J4105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906c0
706a1
Core
Jasper Lake
Gemini Lake
Base frecuency
2 GHz
1.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1338
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
10 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
1536 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
0 kB
Date
March 2021
December 2017
Mean monothread perf.
27.1k points
18.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
64.09k points
61.49k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5105
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
9.83k
4.9k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
9.74k
7.26k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.65k
2.75k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
3.32k (x0.85)
TOTAL
27.1k
18.22k (x0.67)
Multithread
N5105
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
25.04k
18.84k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
24.7k
27.45k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.29k
10.35k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.06k
4.85k (x0.96)
TOTAL
64.09k
61.49k (x0.96)
Performance/W
N5105
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
2504 points/W
1884 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2470 points/W
2745 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
929 points/W
1035 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
506 points/W
485 points/W
TOTAL
6409 points/W
6149 points/W
Performance/GHz
N5105
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
3388 points/GHz
1958 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3358 points/GHz
2902 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1259 points/GHz
1102 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1338 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
9344 points/GHz
7289 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4