Celeron N5100 vs Xeon X5675
Description
The N5100 is based on Tremont architecture while the X5675 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5100 gets a score of 89.8 k points while the X5675 gets 124.9 k points.
Summarizing, the X5675 is 1.4 times faster than the N5100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5100 gets a score of 89.8 k points while the X5675 gets 124.9 k points.
Summarizing, the X5675 is 1.4 times faster than the N5100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906c0
206c2
Core
Jasper Lake
Westmere-EP
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
3.067 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.467 GHz
Socket
BGA 1338
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/4
6 /12
TDP
6 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
1536 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
February 2021
February 2011
Mean monothread perf.
26.98k points
21.04k points
Mean multithread perf.
89.82k points
124.92k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5100
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
9.74k
8.77k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
9.84k
5.82k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.89k
3.47k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
2.98k (x0.85)
TOTAL
26.98k
21.04k (x0.78)
Multithread
N5100
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
34.19k
53.23k (x1.56)
Test#2 (FP)
36.28k
39.35k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.3k
27.05k (x1.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.05k
5.28k (x1.31)
TOTAL
89.82k
124.92k (x1.39)
Performance/W
N5100
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
5699 points/W
560 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6047 points/W
414 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2550 points/W
285 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
674 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
14970 points/W
1315 points/W
Performance/GHz
N5100
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
3479 points/GHz
2529 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3514 points/GHz
1679 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1389 points/GHz
1001 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1255 points/GHz
860 points/GHz
TOTAL
9637 points/GHz
6070 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4