Celeron N5100 vs Xeon W3520
Description
The N5100 is based on Tremont architecture while the W3520 is based on Nehalem.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5100 gets a score of 89.8 k points while the W3520 gets 73.2 k points.
Summarizing, the N5100 is 1.2 times faster than the W3520 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5100 gets a score of 89.8 k points while the W3520 gets 73.2 k points.
Summarizing, the N5100 is 1.2 times faster than the W3520 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906c0
106a5
Core
Jasper Lake
Nehalem-WS
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.667 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.933 GHz
Socket
BGA 1338
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/4
4 /8
TDP
6 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
1536 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
February 2021
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
26.98k points
17.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
89.82k points
73.16k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5100
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
9.74k
7.35k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
9.84k
4.89k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.89k
2.9k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
2.82k (x0.8)
TOTAL
26.98k
17.96k (x0.67)
Multithread
N5100
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
34.19k
29.69k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
36.28k
22.26k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.3k
14.91k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.05k
6.29k (x1.56)
TOTAL
89.82k
73.16k (x0.81)
Performance/W
N5100
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
5699 points/W
228 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6047 points/W
171 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2550 points/W
115 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
674 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
14970 points/W
563 points/W
Performance/GHz
N5100
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
3479 points/GHz
2506 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3514 points/GHz
1669 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1389 points/GHz
989 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1255 points/GHz
960 points/GHz
TOTAL
9637 points/GHz
6123 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4