Celeron N5100 vs Xeon E5645
Description
The N5100 is based on Tremont architecture while the E5645 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5100 gets a score of 89.8 k points while the E5645 gets 77 k points.
Summarizing, the N5100 is 1.2 times faster than the E5645 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5100 gets a score of 89.8 k points while the E5645 gets 77 k points.
Summarizing, the N5100 is 1.2 times faster than the E5645 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906c0
206c2
Core
Jasper Lake
Westmere-EP
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1338
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/4
6 /6
TDP
6 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
1536 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
February 2021
March 2010
Mean monothread perf.
26.98k points
15.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
89.82k points
76.96k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5100
E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
9.74k
6.47k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
9.84k
4.4k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.89k
2.43k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
2.33k (x0.66)
TOTAL
26.98k
15.64k (x0.58)
Multithread
N5100
E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
34.19k
34.43k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
36.28k
24.23k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.3k
14.48k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.05k
3.81k (x0.94)
TOTAL
89.82k
76.96k (x0.86)
Performance/W
N5100
E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
5699 points/W
430 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6047 points/W
303 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2550 points/W
181 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
674 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
14970 points/W
962 points/W
Performance/GHz
N5100
E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
3479 points/GHz
2311 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3514 points/GHz
1573 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1389 points/GHz
867 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1255 points/GHz
833 points/GHz
TOTAL
9637 points/GHz
5584 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4