Celeron N5100 vs Xeon E5-2620 v4
Description
The N5100 is based on Tremont architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5100 gets a score of 89.8 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 182.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 2 times faster than the N5100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5100 gets a score of 89.8 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 182.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 2 times faster than the N5100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906c0
406f1
Core
Jasper Lake
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1338
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
6 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
1536 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
20480 kB
Date
February 2021
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
26.98k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
89.82k points
237.83k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5100
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
9.74k
8.22k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
9.84k
12.06k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.89k
4.01k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
2.89k (x0.82)
TOTAL
26.98k
27.18k (x1.01)
Multithread
N5100
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
34.19k
61.34k (x1.79)
Test#2 (FP)
36.28k
90.21k (x2.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.3k
26.2k (x1.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.05k
4.62k (x1.14)
TOTAL
89.82k
182.37k (x2.03)
Performance/W
N5100
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
5699 points/W
722 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6047 points/W
1061 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2550 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
674 points/W
54 points/W
TOTAL
14970 points/W
2146 points/W
Performance/GHz
N5100
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
3479 points/GHz
2739 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3514 points/GHz
4021 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1389 points/GHz
1335 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1255 points/GHz
963 points/GHz
TOTAL
9637 points/GHz
9059 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4