Celeron N5100 vs Core i7-860
Description
The N5100 is based on Tremont architecture while the i7-860 is based on Nehalem.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5100 gets a score of 89.8 k points while the i7-860 gets 70.7 k points.
Summarizing, the N5100 is 1.3 times faster than the i7-860 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5100 gets a score of 89.8 k points while the i7-860 gets 70.7 k points.
Summarizing, the N5100 is 1.3 times faster than the i7-860 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906c0
106e5
Core
Jasper Lake
Lynnfield
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.467 GHz
Socket
BGA 1338
LGA 1156
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
6 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
1536 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
February 2021
September 2009
Mean monothread perf.
26.98k points
19.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
89.82k points
70.68k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5100
i7-860
Test#1 (Integers)
9.74k
7.83k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
9.84k
5.23k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.89k
2.91k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
3.09k (x0.88)
TOTAL
26.98k
19.07k (x0.71)
Multithread
N5100
i7-860
Test#1 (Integers)
34.19k
29.29k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
36.28k
22.75k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.3k
14.04k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.05k
4.6k (x1.14)
TOTAL
89.82k
70.68k (x0.79)
Performance/W
N5100
i7-860
Test#1 (Integers)
5699 points/W
308 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6047 points/W
240 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2550 points/W
148 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
674 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
14970 points/W
744 points/W
Performance/GHz
N5100
i7-860
Test#1 (Integers)
3479 points/GHz
2259 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3514 points/GHz
1509 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1389 points/GHz
839 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1255 points/GHz
892 points/GHz
TOTAL
9637 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4