Celeron N5100 vs Core i5-8250U
Description
The N5100 is based on Tremont architecture while the i5-8250U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5100 gets a score of 89.8 k points while the i5-8250U gets 122.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8250U is 1.4 times faster than the N5100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5100 gets a score of 89.8 k points while the i5-8250U gets 122.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8250U is 1.4 times faster than the N5100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906c0
806ea
Core
Jasper Lake
Kaby Lake-R
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1338
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
6 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
1536 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
February 2021
August 2017
Mean monothread perf.
26.98k points
53.8k points
Mean multithread perf.
89.82k points
153.5k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5100
i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
9.74k
12.41k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
9.84k
18.11k (x1.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.89k
4.79k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
8.16k (x2.32)
TOTAL
26.98k
43.46k (x1.61)
Multithread
N5100
i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
34.19k
42.48k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
36.28k
60.2k (x1.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.3k
14.85k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.05k
4.77k (x1.18)
TOTAL
89.82k
122.3k (x1.36)
Performance/W
N5100
i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
5699 points/W
2832 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6047 points/W
4014 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2550 points/W
990 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
674 points/W
318 points/W
TOTAL
14970 points/W
8153 points/W
Performance/GHz
N5100
i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
3479 points/GHz
3650 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3514 points/GHz
5327 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1389 points/GHz
1407 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1255 points/GHz
2399 points/GHz
TOTAL
9637 points/GHz
12784 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4