Celeron N5100 vs Core i5-7300HQ
Description
The N5100 is based on Tremont architecture while the i5-7300HQ is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5100 gets a score of 89.8 k points while the i5-7300HQ gets 130.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7300HQ is 1.5 times faster than the N5100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5100 gets a score of 89.8 k points while the i5-7300HQ gets 130.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7300HQ is 1.5 times faster than the N5100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906c0
906e9
Core
Jasper Lake
Kaby Lake-H
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1338
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
6 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
1536 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
February 2021
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
26.98k points
53.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
89.82k points
168.81k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5100
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
9.74k
11.71k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
9.84k
16.74k (x1.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.89k
4.27k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
7.81k (x2.22)
TOTAL
26.98k
40.53k (x1.5)
Multithread
N5100
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
34.19k
44.38k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
36.28k
62.55k (x1.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.3k
15.6k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.05k
7.85k (x1.94)
TOTAL
89.82k
130.38k (x1.45)
Performance/W
N5100
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
5699 points/W
986 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6047 points/W
1390 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2550 points/W
347 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
674 points/W
174 points/W
TOTAL
14970 points/W
2897 points/W
Performance/GHz
N5100
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3479 points/GHz
3347 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3514 points/GHz
4783 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1389 points/GHz
1221 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1255 points/GHz
2231 points/GHz
TOTAL
9637 points/GHz
11581 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4