Celeron N5100 vs Core i5-3320M
Description
The N5100 is based on Tremont architecture while the i5-3320M is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5100 gets a score of 89.8 k points while the i5-3320M gets 54.6 k points.
Summarizing, the N5100 is 1.6 times faster than the i5-3320M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5100 gets a score of 89.8 k points while the i5-3320M gets 54.6 k points.
Summarizing, the N5100 is 1.6 times faster than the i5-3320M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906c0
306a9
Core
Jasper Lake
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1338
BGA1023
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
6 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1536 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
February 2021
June 2012
Mean monothread perf.
26.98k points
29.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
89.82k points
58.81k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5100
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
9.74k
10.89k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
9.84k
9.77k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.89k
3.98k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
3.77k (x1.07)
TOTAL
26.98k
28.4k (x1.05)
Multithread
N5100
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
34.19k
20.23k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
36.28k
20.83k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.3k
9.49k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.05k
4.04k (x1)
TOTAL
89.82k
54.6k (x0.61)
Performance/W
N5100
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
5699 points/W
578 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6047 points/W
595 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2550 points/W
271 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
674 points/W
115 points/W
TOTAL
14970 points/W
1560 points/W
Performance/GHz
N5100
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
3479 points/GHz
3300 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3514 points/GHz
2960 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1389 points/GHz
1205 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1255 points/GHz
1141 points/GHz
TOTAL
9637 points/GHz
8607 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4