Celeron N5100 vs Core i3-1005G1
Description
The N5100 is based on Tremont architecture while the i3-1005G1 is based on Ice Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5100 gets a score of 89.8 k points while the i3-1005G1 gets 94.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1005G1 is 1 times faster than the N5100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5100 gets a score of 89.8 k points while the i3-1005G1 gets 94.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1005G1 is 1 times faster than the N5100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906c0
706e5
Core
Jasper Lake
Ice Lake-U
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
1.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1338
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
6 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
1536 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
February 2021
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
26.98k points
50.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
89.82k points
116.63k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5100
i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
9.74k
10.52k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
9.84k
17.6k (x1.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.89k
8.76k (x2.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
6.55k (x1.86)
TOTAL
26.98k
43.44k (x1.61)
Multithread
N5100
i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
34.19k
26.86k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
36.28k
42.38k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.3k
20.65k (x1.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.05k
4.21k (x1.04)
TOTAL
89.82k
94.1k (x1.05)
Performance/W
N5100
i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
5699 points/W
1791 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6047 points/W
2825 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2550 points/W
1377 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
674 points/W
281 points/W
TOTAL
14970 points/W
6273 points/W
Performance/GHz
N5100
i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
3479 points/GHz
3095 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3514 points/GHz
5177 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1389 points/GHz
2577 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1255 points/GHz
1926 points/GHz
TOTAL
9637 points/GHz
12775 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4