Celeron N5100 vs Phenom II X6 1035T
Description
The N5100 is based on Tremont architecture while the 1035T is based on K10.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5100 gets a score of 89.8 k points while the 1035T gets 80.2 k points.
Summarizing, the N5100 is 1.1 times faster than the 1035T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5100 gets a score of 89.8 k points while the 1035T gets 80.2 k points.
Summarizing, the N5100 is 1.1 times faster than the 1035T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906c0
100fa0
Core
Jasper Lake
Thuban
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1338
Socket AM3
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/6
TDP
6 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
128 kB
Cache L2
1536 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
February 2021
May 2010
Mean monothread perf.
26.98k points
16.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
89.82k points
80.19k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5100
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
9.74k
5.17k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
9.84k
5.33k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.89k
2.76k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
3.51k (x1)
TOTAL
26.98k
16.77k (x0.62)
Multithread
N5100
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
34.19k
29.82k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
36.28k
30.79k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.3k
15.88k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.05k
3.69k (x0.91)
TOTAL
89.82k
80.19k (x0.89)
Performance/W
N5100
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
5699 points/W
314 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6047 points/W
324 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2550 points/W
167 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
674 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
14970 points/W
844 points/W
Performance/GHz
N5100
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
3479 points/GHz
1668 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3514 points/GHz
1718 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1389 points/GHz
890 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1255 points/GHz
1133 points/GHz
TOTAL
9637 points/GHz
5409 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4