Celeron N5100 vs A6 9210
Description
The N5100 is based on Tremont architecture while the 9210 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5100 gets a score of 89.8 k points while the 9210 gets 25.2 k points.
Summarizing, the N5100 is 3.6 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5100 gets a score of 89.8 k points while the 9210 gets 25.2 k points.
Summarizing, the N5100 is 3.6 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906c0
670f00
Core
Jasper Lake
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1338
Socket FP4
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
6 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
1x96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1536 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
0 kB
Date
February 2021
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
26.98k points
20.78k points
Mean multithread perf.
89.82k points
27.13k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5100
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
9.74k
4.87k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
9.84k
10.38k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.89k
2.59k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
2.38k (x0.68)
TOTAL
26.98k
20.22k (x0.75)
Multithread
N5100
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
34.19k
7.41k (x0.22)
Test#2 (FP)
36.28k
11.87k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.3k
3.35k (x0.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.05k
2.6k (x0.64)
TOTAL
89.82k
25.23k (x0.28)
Performance/W
N5100
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
5699 points/W
494 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6047 points/W
792 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2550 points/W
223 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
674 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
14970 points/W
1682 points/W
Performance/GHz
N5100
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
3479 points/GHz
1740 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3514 points/GHz
3707 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1389 points/GHz
925 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1255 points/GHz
851 points/GHz
TOTAL
9637 points/GHz
7222 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4