Celeron N5100 vs Core i5-1135G7
Description
The N5100 is based on Tremont architecture while the i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5100 gets a score of 89.8 k points while the i5-1135G7 gets 141.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1135G7 is 1.6 times faster than the N5100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5100 gets a score of 89.8 k points while the i5-1135G7 gets 141.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1135G7 is 1.6 times faster than the N5100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906c0
806c1
Core
Jasper Lake
Tiger Lake UP3
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1338
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
6 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
1536 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
February 2021
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
26.98k points
68.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
89.82k points
238.87k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5100
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
9.74k
13.43k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
9.84k
22.29k (x2.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.89k
11.18k (x2.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
9.75k (x2.77)
TOTAL
26.98k
56.64k (x2.1)
Multithread
N5100
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
34.19k
40.24k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
36.28k
65.99k (x1.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.3k
28.51k (x1.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.05k
6.66k (x1.65)
TOTAL
89.82k
141.4k (x1.57)
Performance/W
N5100
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
5699 points/W
1437 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6047 points/W
2357 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2550 points/W
1018 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
674 points/W
238 points/W
TOTAL
14970 points/W
5050 points/W
Performance/GHz
N5100
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3479 points/GHz
3197 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3514 points/GHz
5306 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1389 points/GHz
2661 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1255 points/GHz
2321 points/GHz
TOTAL
9637 points/GHz
13486 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4