Celeron N5095 vs Virtual CPU 2,84GHz
Description
The N5095 is based on Tremont architecture while the 2,84GHz is based on -.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5095 gets a score of 93.3 k points while the 2,84GHz gets 79.8 k points.
Summarizing, the N5095 is 1.2 times faster than the 2,84GHz. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5095 gets a score of 93.3 k points while the 2,84GHz gets 79.8 k points.
Summarizing, the N5095 is 1.2 times faster than the 2,84GHz. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906c0
f4a
Core
Jasper Lake
-
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.84 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.84 GHz
Socket
FCBGA 1338
-
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/8
TDP
15 W
- W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
- kB
Cache L2
kB
- kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
- kB
Date
April 2021
-
Mean monothread perf.
26.6k points
21.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
93.26k points
79.76k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5095
2,84GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
10.08k
4.27k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
10.11k
8.93k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.06k
2.79k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.36k
5.23k (x2.22)
TOTAL
26.6k
21.22k (x0.8)
Multithread
N5095
2,84GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
36.86k
19.35k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
38.51k
40.57k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.17k
13.15k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.72k
6.7k (x2.47)
TOTAL
93.26k
79.76k (x0.86)
Performance/W
N5095
2,84GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
2457 points/W