Celeron N5095 vs Xeon X5670
Description
The N5095 is based on Tremont architecture while the X5670 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5095 gets a score of 93.3 k points while the X5670 gets 115.4 k points.
Summarizing, the X5670 is 1.2 times faster than the N5095. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5095 gets a score of 93.3 k points while the X5670 gets 115.4 k points.
Summarizing, the X5670 is 1.2 times faster than the N5095. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906c0
206c2
Core
Jasper Lake
Westmere-EP
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.933 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.333 GHz
Socket
FCBGA 1338
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/4
6 /6
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
64 kB
Cache L2
kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2021
March 2010
Mean monothread perf.
26.6k points
20.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
93.26k points
115.4k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5095
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
10.08k
8.35k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
10.11k
5.58k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.06k
3.32k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.36k
3k (x1.27)
TOTAL
26.6k
20.26k (x0.76)
Multithread
N5095
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
36.86k
49.72k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
38.51k
35.19k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.17k
21.88k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.72k
8.6k (x3.17)
TOTAL
93.26k
115.4k (x1.24)
Performance/W
N5095
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
2457 points/W
523 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2567 points/W
370 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1012 points/W
230 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
181 points/W
91 points/W
TOTAL
6217 points/W
1215 points/W
Performance/GHz
N5095
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
3475 points/GHz
2506 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3486 points/GHz
1675 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1399 points/GHz
997 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
814 points/GHz
900 points/GHz
TOTAL
9174 points/GHz
6078 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4