| | | | | | |

Celeron N5095 vs Core i5-8500T


Description
The N5095 is based on Tremont architecture while the i5-8500T is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5095 gets a score of 93.3 k points while the i5-8500T gets 203.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-8500T is 2.2 times faster than the N5095. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906c0
906ea
Core
Jasper Lake
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
FCBGA 1338
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/6
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
9216 kB
Date
April 2021
March 2018
Mean monothread perf.
26.6k points
59.27k points
Mean multithread perf.
93.26k points
251.82k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5095
i5-8500T
Test#1 (Integers)
10.08k
12.93k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
10.11k
18.61k (x1.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.06k
4.76k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.36k
10.05k (x4.26)
TOTAL
26.6k
46.36k (x1.74)

Multithread

N5095

i5-8500T
Test#1 (Integers)
36.86k
71.15k (x1.93)
Test#2 (FP)
38.51k
102.74k (x2.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.17k
26.6k (x1.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.72k
2.9k (x1.07)
TOTAL
93.26k
203.39k (x2.18)

Performance/W
N5095
i5-8500T
Test#1 (Integers)
2457 points/W
2033 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2567 points/W
2935 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1012 points/W
760 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
181 points/W
83 points/W
TOTAL
6217 points/W
5811 points/W

Performance/GHz
N5095
i5-8500T
Test#1 (Integers)
3475 points/GHz
3695 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3486 points/GHz
5318 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1399 points/GHz
1360 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
814 points/GHz
2873 points/GHz
TOTAL
9174 points/GHz
13245 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4