Celeron N5095 vs Core i3-540
Description
The N5095 is based on Tremont architecture while the i3-540 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5095 gets a score of 93.3 k points while the i3-540 gets 38.9 k points.
Summarizing, the N5095 is 2.4 times faster than the i3-540 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5095 gets a score of 93.3 k points while the i3-540 gets 38.9 k points.
Summarizing, the N5095 is 2.4 times faster than the i3-540 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906c0
20655
Core
Jasper Lake
Clarkdale
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.067 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.067 GHz
Socket
FCBGA 1338
LGA 1156
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
15 W
73 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2021
January 2010
Mean monothread perf.
26.6k points
18.27k points
Mean multithread perf.
93.26k points
38.86k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5095
i3-540
Test#1 (Integers)
10.08k
7.65k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
10.11k
5.14k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.06k
3.06k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.36k
2.42k (x1.03)
TOTAL
26.6k
18.27k (x0.69)
Multithread
N5095
i3-540
Test#1 (Integers)
36.86k
16.21k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
38.51k
12.04k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.17k
8.28k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.72k
2.33k (x0.86)
TOTAL
93.26k
38.86k (x0.42)
Performance/W
N5095
i3-540
Test#1 (Integers)
2457 points/W
222 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2567 points/W
165 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1012 points/W
113 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
181 points/W
32 points/W
TOTAL
6217 points/W
532 points/W
Performance/GHz
N5095
i3-540
Test#1 (Integers)
3475 points/GHz
2494 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3486 points/GHz
1676 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1399 points/GHz
999 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
814 points/GHz
789 points/GHz
TOTAL
9174 points/GHz
5958 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4