| | | | | | |

Celeron N5095 vs Core i3-1005G1


Description
The N5095 is based on Tremont architecture while the i3-1005G1 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5095 gets a score of 93.3 k points while the i3-1005G1 gets 94.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-1005G1 is 1 times faster than the N5095. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906c0
706e5
Core
Jasper Lake
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
1.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
FCBGA 1338
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2021
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
26.6k points
50.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
93.26k points
116.63k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5095
i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
10.08k
10.52k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
10.11k
17.6k (x1.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.06k
8.76k (x2.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.36k
6.55k (x2.77)
TOTAL
26.6k
43.44k (x1.63)

Multithread

N5095

i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
36.86k
26.86k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
38.51k
42.38k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.17k
20.65k (x1.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.72k
4.21k (x1.55)
TOTAL
93.26k
94.1k (x1.01)

Performance/W
N5095
i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
2457 points/W
1791 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2567 points/W
2825 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1012 points/W
1377 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
181 points/W
281 points/W
TOTAL
6217 points/W
6273 points/W

Performance/GHz
N5095
i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
3475 points/GHz
3095 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3486 points/GHz
5177 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1399 points/GHz
2577 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
814 points/GHz
1926 points/GHz
TOTAL
9174 points/GHz
12775 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4